LEGAL PROTECTION FOR MINING IUP HOLDERS IN LAND RIGHTS DISPUTES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48171/dejure.v6i2.126Keywords:
legal protection , mining business license holders , disputes , property right , landAbstract
This thesis research aims to theoretically find the legal standing of mining permits in land rights disputes and to theoretically analyze the regulatory legal protection for holders of Mining Business Licenses (IUP) and land rights owners in mining business permit areas.
This research uses the Theory of Legal Certainty by Utrech & Gustav Radburg, the Theory of Legal Protection by Fitzgeral & Salmond, and Satjipto Raharjo. The method used is normative and doctrinal juridical, prescriptive in nature, employing the Statute approach, Conceptual approach, and Case approach, specifically the Decision of the Panel of Judges of the Samarinda Administrative Court Number 30/G/2019/PTUN.SMD.
Differences with previous research: Engine Kubota titled Legal Issues in Resolving Agrarian Disputes in the Mineral and Coal Sector According to the Law and Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 96 of 2021, there are still many articles that were initially introduced to maximize the constitutional function that were not accommodated by previous laws, but in reality, they have turned into massive corruption affecting the social welfare of the community. The impact caused by the existence of this new Mineral and Coal Law is very significant. Starting from the difficulty for the community to file protests and demands against mining companies, the complicated regulations that must be navigated to receive services, confusing administrative sanctions, and even extending to other material and non-material losses.
The findings from this research indicate that the position of Mining Business Licenses (IUP) / Special Mining Business Licenses (IUPK) as the right to utilize mineral resources attached to the land, in practice, requires the approval of the landowner. Holders of Mining Business Licenses (IUP) / Special Mining Business Licenses (IUPK) are protected through legal mechanisms to carry out their business activities as long as they comply with legal obligations, including land acquisition and compensation to landowners, in order to create a balance between national economic interests and the civil rights of the community
References
Buku
Ali, Achmad. 2019. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bastian. Damayanti Utami.2012. Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pemanfaatan Tanah Oleh Petani di Wilayah Pertambangan PT Kayan Putra Utama Coal . Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman
Bakri. Muhammad. 2018. Hak Menguasai Tanah Oleh Negara Yogyakarta:Paradigma Baru Untuk Reformasi Agraria.
Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu. 2018. Teori-Teori Hukum, Malang:Setara Press.
Hadimulyo. 2017. Mempertimbangkan ADR Kajian Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Jakarta:Elsam.
Tri. Hayati. 2015. Era Baru Hukum Pertambangan Dibawah Rezim UU No 4 Tahun 2009. Jakarta:Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Marifah, Monika PA, Neni Susilawati, dkk.., 2025, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Kontemporer, CV. Bumi Utama Mandiri, Yogyakarta : Deepublish.
Murad. Rusmadi. 2019. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Atas Tanah. Bandung:Alumni.
Nurnaningsih Amriani, 2019. Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Perdata di Pengadilan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Prayudi Atmosudirjo. 2019. Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Salle. Aminuddin, 2018. Hukum Agraria. Makassar : Ai Publishing.
Salinding, Marthen B. 2019. Prinsip Hukum Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Yang Berpihak Kepada Masyarakat Hukum Adat.Jurnal Konstitusi
Sumardjono. Maria S.W. 2020, Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya, Jakarta: Kompas.
Sumarto. 2018. Penanganan dan Penyelesaian Konflik Pertanahan Dengan Prinsip Win-Win Solution Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional RI. Jakarta: Diklat Kemendagri RI.
Sunarno, Praktek ADR (Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Tanah, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 13, No. 1 2006. Yogyakarta : FH UMY
Sutedi. Adrian. 2017. Implementasi Prinsip Kepentingan Umum Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Syarief. Elza. 2019. Menuntaskan Sengketa Tanah Melalui Pengadilan Khusus Pertanahan, Jakarta : Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia
Artikel Jurnal
Kubota. Engine. 2022. Persoalan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria di Bidang Mineral dan Batubara Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.
Putri. Nabilla Desyalika. 2014. Kedudukan Hukum Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Pada Kawasan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Konteks Negara Kesejahteraan. Malang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
Putri. Priesty Yustika. 2015. Penyelesaian Hak Atas Tanah Antara Pemilik Lahan Dengan Perusahaan Pertambangan Pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan (Studi Kasus Di PT IMMS Cabang Lumajang). Malang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramadhani Ramadhani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








