KESEIMBANGAN HAK PEKERJA DALAM PEMUTUSAN  HUBUNGAN KERJA SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH  PERUSAHAAN

Tumen Tumen; Karlie Hanafi  Kalianda

doi:10.48171/dejure.v6i1.103

Authors

Tumen Tumen Program Magister Ilmu Hukum STIH Sultan Adam
Karlie Hanafi Kalianda Program Magister Ilmu Hukum STIH Sultan Adam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48171/dejure.v6i1.103

Keywords:

balance, workers' rights , termination of employment , against the law

Abstract

This research aims to theoretically explore the protection and legal guarantees of workers' rights in unlawful termination of employment (PHK) by companies and to legally analyze the workers' legal efforts to reject and sue companies that unlawfully terminate employment through the Industrial Relations Court until the final decision. This research uses Aristotle & John Rawls' Theory of Justice, Fitzgerald's Theory of Legal Protection, and Utrecht & CST.Kansil's Theory of Legal Certainty (Legality).

The methods used are normative juridical and doctrinal juridical, which are prescriptive in nature, employing the Statute approach, Conceptual approach, and Case approach, namely Supreme Court Decision Number 33K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021, Supreme Court Decision Number 822 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI.2022, Judge's Panel Decision Number 353/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN.Jkt.Pusat, and Judge's Panel Decision Number 507.K/Pdt.SusPHI/2022/Pn.Mdn.

Difference from previous research: (1) Mawardi Khairi states that the legal efforts that can be undertaken by workers who feel aggrieved due to termination of employment to restore their rights are litigation efforts through the court and non-litigation efforts through bipartite or tripartite means. (2) Guntur Putra Ramadhan stated that layoffs based on Law No. 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation are prohibited from being carried out unilaterally without clearly informing the plan and information. Unilateral termination can harm and undermine the values of the 1945 Constitution and Pancasila in protecting the rights of the nation's children.; (3) Yoan Ean Yuri stated that the termination in this Omnibus Law is not much different from previous legal instruments, although there are provisions for sanctions against employers who terminate unilaterally.

The findings from this research indicate that the protection and guarantees provided by legal instruments for workers against unlawful termination aim to ensure justice and balance of rights between workers and employers.The government, companies, and workers must contribute to creating a harmonious and balanced industrial relationship.Legal actions that workers can take if the termination is proven to be illegal, workers are entitled to recovery or compensation according to the applicable regulations.

References

Buku/ Literatur

Harahap, M. Yahya (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Khairi, M. (2021). Perlindungan Hak-hak

Buruh yang Mendapatkat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja oleh Perusahaan pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Bogor: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pakuan.

Mamudji, S. S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Utama.

Marifah, Monika PA, Neni Susilawati, dkk.., (2025), Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Kontemporer, CV. Bumi Utama Mandiri, Yogyakarta : Deepublish.

Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Nailufat, I. H. (2022). Cara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan

Industrial. Jakarta: Kompas.

Septiana, Rina & Ayu, Riana Kesuma. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Nusa Media.

Setiono. (2004). Rule of Law. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas

Sebelas.

Telaumbanua, D. (2019). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RepubliK Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan

Hubungan Industrial.

Undanag-Undang Nomor 39 Tentang Perkebunan

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Atas UndangUndang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan. Batubara

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti UndangUndang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang cipta Kerja.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun

2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2021). Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Putusan No. 3/K/Pdt. Sus-PHI/2021.

Jurnal

Sonhaji. Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Kesalahan Berat Pekerja. Administrative Law & Governance Journal. Vol.2, No.1 (2019). p.61.

Yahya, Achmad N. Dari Kontrak Seumur Hidup Hingga PHK Sepihak, Ini 8 Poin UU Cipta Kerja Yang Jadi Sorotan Buruh. Jurnal

Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Vol.3 No.1 (2021), pp.109-120.

Yuri, Y. E. (2023). Perlindungan Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Undang-Undang Omnibus Law yang Bertentangan dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Padang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah

Sumatera Barat.

Interner/ Website

Santoso, S. (2023, September 11). Hukum Online. Retrieved Juli 03, 2024, from https://www.hukumonline.com